DEEP AND DARK ECOLOGY: PARADIGMS OF CONTEMPORARY ECOLOGICAL THOUGHT
Views: 63 / PDF downloads: 22DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32523/3080-1281-2026-154-1-49-65Keywords:
deep ecology; dark ecology; Arne Naess; Timothy Morton; anthropocentrism; ecological crisis; hyperobjects; self-realizationAbstract
The article offers a comparative analysis of two paradigms of contemporary ecological thought: Arne Naess’s deep ecology and Timothy Morton’s dark ecology. It explores the main points of convergence and divergence between these approaches through their philosophical premises, concepts of nature, declared aims, and the concrete strategies they suggest for addressing ecological challenges. The study relies on theoretical, comparative, contextual, and critical methods, paying particular attention to Naess’s idea of “self-realization” and Morton’s notion of “hyperobjects.” A special focus is placed on how these concepts challenge anthropocentric perspectives, reconsider the position of the human being in ecological systems, and propose different interpretations of ecological crisis. Deep ecology is interpreted as a normatively and practically oriented perspective based on biocentrism, ecological equality, and recognition of the intrinsic value of all forms of life. Dark ecology, in turn, is characterized as a more critical and ambivalent current that underscores uncertainty, entanglement, and the unsettling dimension of nature. The article evaluates the strengths and limitations of both frameworks and outlines possible ways of combining their insights for reflection on the global ecological crisis. This makes clear their joint contribution to contemporary ecological philosophical debates.
Downloads
References
Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. Pantheon Books. [in English]
Callicott, J. B. (1999). Beyond the land ethic: More essays in ecological philosophy. State University of New York Press. [in English]
Devall, B., & Sessions, G. (1985). Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered. Gibbs Smith. [in English]
Drengson, A. R., & Devall, B. (Eds.). (2010). The ecology of wisdom: Writings by Arne Naess. Counterpoint. [in English]
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. [in English]
Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature: Rethinking ecological aesthetics. Harvard University Press. [in English]
Morton, T. (2010). The ecological thought. Harvard University Press. [in English]
Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. University of Minnesota Press. [in English]
Morton, T. (2016). Dark ecology: For a logic of future coexistence. Columbia University Press. [in English]
Morton, T. (2017). Humankind: Solidarity with nonhuman people. Verso Press. [in English]
Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry, 16(1-4), 95–100. [in English]
Naess, A. (1985). Identification as a source of deep ecological attitudes. In M. Tobias (Ed.), Deep ecology (pp. 256–270). Avant Books. [in English]
Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle: Outline of an ecosophy. Cambridge University Press. [in English]
Boulton, E. (2016). Climate change as a ‘hyperobject’: a critical review of Timothy Morton’s reframing narrative. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(5), 772–785. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.410 [in English]
Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press. [in English]
Warren, K. (2000). Ecofeminist philosophy: A Western perspective on what it is and why it matters. Indiana University Press. [in English]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ерлан АУБАКИРОВ, Сергей МЕЗЕНЦЕВ, Сайра ШАМАХАЙ (Автор)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.









