HIERARCHIES OF THE FRONTIER: POWER PRACTICES IN THE COLONIZED URALS AND TRANS-URALS (15TH - 18TH CENTURIES)
Views: 104 / PDF downloads: 25DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32523/3080-1281-2026-154-1-239-251Keywords:
early modernity, colonialism, Muscovite state, Urals, Trans-Urals, StroganovsAbstract
The paper identifies the main ways of organizing power hierarchies in the vast region of the Urals and the Trans-Urals from the middle of the 15th century — the time when the Moscow state began its expansion towards the North-Western Urals, — though the middle of the 16th century (the emergence of the Stroganov latifundia in the Kama region with the subsequent conquest of the Western Siberia by Ermak’s military expedition organized by Stroganovs) to the early 18th century. This region was characterized by a complex ethnic and confessional composition, with local elites that predated the arrival of the Moscow state and maintained intricate relations with Muscovite authorities. Drawing on chronicles and administrative documents of the period, as well as the works of contemporary scholars in ethnic and estate history, I aim to highlight specific practices of the central government that combined efforts to unify forms of rule with attempts to transform elements of the regional diversity — Slavic, Finno-Ugric, and Turkic groups — into ‘quasi-estates’, each assigned a distinct ‘service’ within the framework of the emerging empire. The article analyses the previously largely unexplored issue of the disappearance of the Komi-Permyak population in the Middle Kama region — within the Stroganovs’ “latifundia.”
Downloads
References
Arkhangelogorodskii Letopisets (Ustiuzhskaia Letopis’) [The Arkhangelsk (Ustyug) Chronicle]. (1972). In Polnoe Sobranie Russkikh Letopisei. Leningrad, vol. 37. [In Russian]
Belavin, A.M., Ivanov, V.A., & Krylasova, N. B. (2021). “Archaeological Indicators of the Culture of the Ancient Hungarians in the Urals: Real and Imaginary.” Zolotoordynskoe nasledie, 4 (Kazan: Institute of History, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan), 35–42. [In Russian]
Etkind, A. (2011). Internal Colonization: Russia's Imperial Experience. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gramota to Iakov and Grigorii Stroganov concerning the dispatch of armed men to subdue the Cheremis and other Siberian “aliens” who had been committing raids along the Kama River (August 6, 1572). In Dopolneniia k aktam istoricheskim, sobrannye i izdannye Arkheograficheskoi komissiei [Supplements to the Historical Acts, Collected and Published by the Archaeographic Commission], vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Press of the Second Department of His Imperial Majesty’s Chancellery, 1846, pp. 175–176. [In Russian]
Korchagin P.A., & Samigulov, G.Kh. (2023). About Takhcheia in the letter of commendation to Yakov and Grigory Stroganov dated May 30, 1574. In Zolotoordynskoe obozrenie [Golden Horde Review], 11(3), 693–713. DOI: 10.22378/2313-6197.2023-11-3.693-713 [In Russian]
Korchagin, P.A. (2011). “Essays on the Early History of Great Perm: The Princes of Perm and Vym’.” Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Series: History, 15(1), 114–126. [In Russian]
Matveev, A.V., & Tataurov, S.F. (2012). The Siberian Khanate: Military-Political Aspects of Its History. Kazan: FEN AN RT. [In Russian]
Müller, G. F. (1750). Opisanie Sibirskogo tsarstva [Description of the Siberian Tsardom]. St. Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences, pp. 87-90. [In Russian]
Sal’manov, A.S. (2021). “Attempts by the Kuchumovichi and the Bashkirs to Re-establish the Siberian Khanate after Ermak’s Campaign.” Oriental Studies, 14(2), 238–247. [In Russian]
Samigulov, G. (2012). “On the Border between the Nogai Horde and the Siberian Khanate in the Southern Trans-Urals.” Srednevekovye tiurko-tatarskie gosudarstva, 4, 126–130. (In Russian).
Samigulov, G. Kh. (2015). “Teptiars and the Teptiar Yasak in the Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth Century.” Vestnik Cheliabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 24(379), series “History,” issue 66, 25–30. [In Russian]
Samigulov, G. Kh. (2018). “Yasak-Paying People, ‘Foreigners,’ Yasak, and Gift Exchange: Practical Reflections on Theory.” Golden Horde Review, 6(2), 342–369. DOI: 10.22378/2313-6197.2018-6-2.342-369 [In Russian]
Samigulov, G. Kh. (2021). “Yasak, Rents, Votchina: The Yasak-Paying Populations of the Volga–Ural Region and Western Siberia, 16th–18th Centuries.” In Sistema zemlevladeniia i sotsial’nye kategorii naseleniia Volgo-Ural’ia i Zapadnoi Sibiri XVI–XIX vv. [The System of Landholding and Social Categories of the Population of the Volga–Ural Region and Western Siberia, 16th–19th Centuries]. Kazan’, pp. 118–129. [In Russian]
Samigulov, G.Kh. (2022). “Votchinas of Yasak-Paying People from the Volga Region to Western Siberia, 16th–18th Centuries.” In Sluzhilye i yasachnye liudi v Rossii XV–XIX vv.: osobennosti zemlevladeniia, soslovnye nominatsii [Service and Yasak-Paying People in Russia, 15th–19th Centuries: Features of Landholding and Estate Terminology]. Chelyabinsk: Biblioteka A. Millera, pp. 91–98. [In Russian]
Samigulov, G.Kh. (2025a). “The Depth of the Frontier: Two Episodes Concerning the Frontier of the Southeastern Russian Empire in the 1730s–1740s.” In “Pogranich’e: gde nachalo togo kontsa?” Materialy konferentsii [The Frontier: Where Is the Beginning of That End?” Conference Proceedings]. Chelyabinsk: Obshchestvennyi fond “Iuzhnyi Ural,” pp. 131–145. [In Russian]
Samigulov, G.Kh. (2025b). “The Meaning of the Term ‘Tatars’ in Muscovite Documents Concerning the Trans-Urals, Late Sixteenth–Eighteenth Centuries.” Golden Horde Review, 13(2), 392–399. [In Russian]
Samigulov, G.Kh. (Ed.). (2020). K istorii tiurkskogo naseleniia Iuzhnogo Zaural’ia XVII–XIX vv. [Toward the History of the Turkic Population of the Southern Trans-Urals, 17th–19th Centuries]. Chelyabinsk: Biblioteka A. Millera. [In Russian]
Samigulov, G.Kh. (Ed.). (2022, 2024). Sluzhilye i yasachnye liudi v Rossii XV–XIX vv.: osobennosti zemlevladeniia, soslovnye nominatsii [Service and Yasak-Paying People in Russia, 15th–19th Centuries: Features of Landholding and Estate Terminology]. Chelyabinsk: Biblioteka A. Millera, pp. 91–98. [In Russian]
Solodkin, Ia. G. (2015). Yermak’s ‘Taking’ of Siberia’: Debated Problems of History and Source Studies. Nizhnevartovsk: Izdatel’stvo Nizhnevartovskogo universiteta. [In Russian]
Thyrêt, I. (2017). “The Esipov Chronicle and the Creation of the Concept of Siberia.” Russian History, 44(4), 594–607.
Trepavlov, V.V. (2012). The Siberian Yurt after Ermak: Kuchum and the Kuchumovichi in the Struggle for Revenge. Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura RAN. [In Russian]
Valk, S.N. (Ed.) (1949). Gramoty Velikogo Novgoroda i Pskova [The Charters of Veliky Novgorod and Pskov]. Moscow and Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of the USSR, pp. 46–47. [In Russian]
Vvedenskii, A.A. (1962). The Stroganov House in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi literatury. [In Russian].
Vydchegodsko-Vymskaia (Misailo-Evtikhievskaia) Chronicle [Vychеgodsko-Vym’ Chronicle]. (1958). In Istoriko-filologicheskii sbornik, Komi Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 4, Syktyvkar, 257–271. [In Russian]
Yerusalimskii, K. (2025). The Emperor of Holy Rus’. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. [In Russian]
Zuev, A.S., & Slugina, V.A. (2015). “Chronicle Reports on Oath-Taking (Shertovanie) by Siberian Peoples during Ermak’s Campaign and Their Historical Context.” Rossiiskaia istoriia, 3, 30–44. [In Russian]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Алексей КАМЕНСКИХ (Автор)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.









