THESIS «MYTH AS A DISEASE OF LANGUAGE»: THE INFLUENCE OF MAX MÜLLER’S UNDERSTANDING OF MYTH ON THE DOCTRINE OF REVELATION AND THE HERMENEUTICS OF SACRED TEXTS
Views: 144 / PDF downloads: 33DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32523/3080-1281-2026-154-1-223-238Keywords:
Friedrich Max Müller; myth as a disease of language; revelation and language; hermeneutics of sacred texts; comparative study of religions; theory of mythAbstract
The article offers a systematic analysis of F. M. Müller’s formula “mythology is a disease of language” and its consequences for the understanding of the nature of myth, the language of revelation, and the hermeneutics of sacred texts. Drawing on Müller’s key works (Comparative Mythology, Lectures on the Science of Language, Introduction to the Science of Religion, the Hibbert and Gifford Lectures, as well as the programmatic texts of The Sacred Books of the East project), the study reconstructs his philological–linguistic model of mythogenesis: semantic shifts, personification, and the “hardening” of metaphors, described through the transition from nomina to numina. Special attention is paid to the “core–shell” model, within which revelation is conceived as an intuition of the Infinite that inevitably becomes overgrown with historical, linguistic, and mythic layers as it enters human discourse. It is shown that Müller’s philological hermeneutics provides a productive resource for criticizing naive literalism and opens up a space for symbolic reading. At the same time, it generates theological and methodological constraints: linguistic reductionism, textocentrism, and a tendency toward Eurocentric universalism (including in the discourse of “world religions”). As a conclusion, the article proposes a dialectical model for appropriating Müller’s legacy. It presupposes preserving philological rigor while integrating it into an expanded hermeneutics that takes into account ritual, power, social memory, and postcolonial/feminist perspectives. From this angle, the thesis of the “disease of language” is read not as a call to eliminate myth, but as an indication of the inherent tension of language as a medium of revelation.
Downloads
References
Красухин, К. Г., (б.д.). МЮЛЛЕР МАКС. Большая российская энциклопедия—Электронная версия. Извлечено 2 февраль 2026 г., от https://old.bigenc.ru/linguistics/text/2242045
Михайлович, А. В., Ивановна, В. О., & Викторович, Н. О. (2023). Макс Мюллер в истории языкознания: Забытая классика или трамплин в будущее? К 200-летию со дня рождения. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Теория языка. Семиотика. Семантика, 14(3), 616–632.
Целковский, Г. А. (2014). Лингвистические корни религиоведения. Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета. Серия 1: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение, (54 (4)), 97–108.
Carroll, M. P. (1985). Some third thoughts on Max Müller and solar mythology. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie / Europäisches Archiv für Soziologie, 26(2), 263–281.
Davis, J. R., & Nicholls, A. (2016). Friedrich Max Müller: The Career and Intellectual Trajectory of a German Philologist in Victorian Britain. Publications of the English Goethe Society, 85(2–3), 67–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593683.2016.1224493
Girardot, N. J. (2002). Max Müller’s «Sacred Books» and the Nineteenth-Century Production of the Comparative Science of Religions. History of Religions, 41(3), 213–250. https://doi.org/10.1086/463683
Karataş, İ. E. (2016). MAX MÜLLER’E GÖRE DİNİN ORTAYA ÇIKIŞ SÜRECİNDE SINIRSIZ (KUTSAL) FİKRİ. Düzce Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 54–86.
Masuzawa, T. (2003). Our Master’s Voice: F. Max Müller after A Hundred Years of Solitude. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 15(4), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006803322697399
Molendijk, A. L. (2016). Forgotten Bibles: Friedrich Max Müller’s Edition of the Sacred Books of the East. Publications of the English Goethe Society, 85(2–3), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593683.2016.1224507
Müller, F. M. (1871). Lectures on the science of language (6th ed.). Longmans, Green.
Müller, F. M. (1899). Introduction to the science of religion. Longmans.
Musolff, A. (2016). Friedrich Max Müller’s Cultural Concept of Metaphor. Publications of the English Goethe Society, 85(2–3), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593683.2016.1224509
Neufeldt, R. (1992). Christianity and «Other Religions»: Contributions from the Work of F. Max. Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.7825/2164-6279.1056
Nicholls, A. (2015). Max Müller and the Comparative Method. Comparative Critical Studies, 12(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.3366/ccs.2015.0168
Palmieri, K. (2023). Friedrich Max Müller’s Rubicon: Historicism and empiricism in the Victorian sciences of language and mind. Science in Context, 36(3), 322–344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889725100707
Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation Theory. Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Christian University Press. https://www.uni-trier.de/fileadmin/fb1/prof/PHI/003/Bilddateien/Ricoeur_Interpretation_Theory.pdf
Ricoeur, P. (2004). The Rule of Metaphor (0 изд.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426616
Schrempp, G. (1983). The Re-Education of Friedrich Max Muller: Intellectual Appropriation and Epistemological Antinomy in Mid-Victorian Evolutionary Thought. Man, 18(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.2307/2801766
Segal, R. A. (2016). Friedrich Max Müller on Religion and Myth. Publications of the English Goethe Society, 85(2–3), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593683.2016.1224513
Stone, J. R. (2002). Religion, Myth, and Custom. В J. R. Stone (Ред.), The Essential Max Müller On Language, Mythology, and Religion (сс. 279–291). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-08450-7_15
Strenski, I. (1996). Misreading Max Müller. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 8(3), 291–296.
Van Den Bosch, L. P. (2002). Friedrich Max Müller: A Life Devoted to the Humanities. BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004379176
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Динара КУЖАХМЕТОВА, Нурмухамед КЕНЖЕГУЛОВ (Автор)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.









