IDENTIFYING AND DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF CHILDREN AGED 9–13 WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF PHILOSOPHY FOR CHILDREN (P4C)

Views: 147 / PDF downloads: 60

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32523/3080-1281-2026-154-1-66-84

Keywords:

Philosophy for Children; philosophical dialogue; critical thinking; thinking skills; P4C methodology

Abstract

This study is based on Matthew Lipman's Philosophy for Children (P4C) methodology and highlights the role of philosophical dialogue lessons in identifying and developing children’s thinking skills aged 9-13. Philosophy provides a flexible, universal approach to thinking, relevant for both adults and children across every domain of knowledge. In today’s digital society, the importance of introducing philosophy from childhood through P4C is particularly significant for the natural development of children’s thinking skills. Philosophical dialogue sessions teach children to think deeply, share ideas, view the world from unique perspectives, provide meaningful responses, make decisions, reflect, and strengthen self-confidence.

The purpose of this study is to identify various thinking skills in children through philosophical dialogue and to demonstrate ways to develop them. Data were analyzed using observation and surveys, with a focus on content analysis. The introductions of each philosophical dialogue session, featuring stimulating materials and national values, supported the development of children’s varied thinking abilities. The study’s findings demonstrate the impact of philosophical education on children’s intellectual and personal development and highlight its importance and necessity in the contemporary national education system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ainara SARSENBAYEVA, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

    master’s student, Department of Philosophy, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 Al-Farabi Avenue, 050040, Almaty, Kazakhstan

  • Asset KURANBEK, University of California

    Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Visiting Scholar, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA

References

Anderson, A. (2020). Categories of Goals in Philosophy for Children. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39, 607–623. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-020-09724

Castleberry, J. B., & Clark, K. M. (2020). Expanding the Facilitator’s Toolbox: Vygotskian Mediation in Philosophy for Children. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 40(2), 44–58. URL: https://journal.viterbo.edu/index.php/atpp/article/view/1183

Fondation SEVE. (2018). Savoir être et vivre ensemble. URL: https://www.fondationseve.org

Gunes, G. (2024). The Effect of Philosophy for Children (P4C) Activities on the Development of Moral Perception and Social Rules of Preschool Children. Journal of Childhood Education and Society, 5(2), 238–255. URL: https://doi.org/10.37291/2717638X.202452392

Ciğerci, F.M., & Çiğdemir, S., (2025). The Impact of AI-supported Philosophy for Children (P4C) Activities on Primary School Students’ Language and Thinking Skills. Beytulhikme: An International Journal of Philosophy, 15(3), 1267–1301. URL: https://doi.org/10.29228/beytulhikme.83791.

Hawken, J. (2016). Philosopher avec les enfants: Enquête théorique et expérimentale sur une pratique de l’ouverture d’esprit. Thèse de doctorat en philosophie. Université Paris 8. URL: https://www.theses.fr/2016PA080020.

Hawken, J., & Sasseville, M. (2020). Abécédaire de la philosophie pour enfants. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.

Lenoir, F. (2016). Philosopher et méditer avec les enfants. Paris: Albin Michel.

Lipman, M., & Sharp, A.M. (1975). Teaching children philosophical thinking: An introduction to the teacher’s manual for “Harry Stottlemeier’s discovery.” Montclair, NJ: Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children.

Lipman, M., & Sharp, A.M. (1978). Some Educational Presuppositions of Philosophy for Children. Oxford Review of Education, 4(1), 90.

Lipman, M., Sharp, A.M., & Oscanyan, F.S. (1980). Philosophy in the Classroom (2nd ed.). Temple University Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Michaud, O., & Gregory, M.R. (2022). Philosophy for Children as a Form of Spiritual Education. Childhood & Philosophy, 18, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2022.69865

SAPERE. (2020). Philosophy for Children. URL: https://www.sapere.org.uk

UNESCO. (2007). Philosophy: A school of freedom – Teaching philosophy and learning to philosophize: Status and prospects. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000154173

Université de Nantes. (n.d.). Chaire UNESCO – Pratiques de la philosophie avec les enfants. URL: https://chaireunescophiloenfants.univ-nantes.fr

Ventista, O. M. (2019). An Evaluation of the “Philosophy for Children” Programme: The Impact on Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Skills. Doctoral dissertation, Durham University. URL: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/13121.

Андрианов, М.А. (2003). Философия для детей (в сказках и рассказах). Минск: Современное слово.

Қазақстан Республикасының 2002 жылғы 8 тамыздағы № 345 «Баланың құқықтары туралы» Заңы [Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 345 “On the Rights of the Child” dated August 8, 2002]. Adilet LIS. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/Z020000345 (қаралған күні: 03.11.2025)

Пиаже, Ж. (2004). Психология интеллекта. Санкт-Петербург: Питер.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

“IDENTIFYING AND DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF CHILDREN AGED 9–13 WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF PHILOSOPHY FOR CHILDREN (P4C)”. 2026. JETE – JОURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, RELIGIOUS AND CULTURAL STUDIES 154 (1): 66-84. https://doi.org/10.32523/3080-1281-2026-154-1-66-84.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 35

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.